Cases 131 - 140 of 476
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cardona Vargas et al v. Britannica Floor Covering, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02998
Plaintiff:
Armando Medina, Deyson Cardona Vargas and Edward Gomez
Defendant:
Britannica Floor Covering, Inc., Rodolfo Cherres, Manuel Cherres and others
Robinson v. Vigorito, Barker, Patterson, Nichols & Porter, LLP et al
as 1:2019cv02914
Defendant:
Anna I. Hock, John Doe, Ruth Bogatyrow-Kraft and others
Plaintiff:
Alberto Robinson and Albert Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Medina v. Ramos et al
as 1:2019cv03136
Defendant:
New York City Department Of Corrections, Nichole Adams-Flores, Correction Officer Wadley and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Medina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medina-Delacruz v. Choi et al
as 1:2019cv02800
Defendant:
Hanyong Choi and Han Sung Sikpoom Trading Corp.
Plaintiff:
Eddy E Medina-Delacruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Medina Melo et al v. S & P Mini Market Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv02788
Plaintiff:
Wilfredo Medina Melo
Defendant:
S & P Mini Market Corp. and Amantino Vega Rosario
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Medina v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
as 1:2019cv02267
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Medina
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corp.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20109
Steier v. Steier et al
as 1:2019cv01445
Defendant:
Peter Rene Valentine Medina, Jason Scott Pergolizzi, Esq., Emelita Yasto Gatchalian and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Oliver Steier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Medina v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv00177
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Manuel Edwin Medina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
