Cases 131 - 140 of 7,397
Clayton v. Angol
as 3:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
Terry Anthony Clayton
Respondent:
Sara Angol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schneider v. Pallenberg
as 3:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
Lucas C. Schneider
Defendant:
Philip Pallenberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flora v. Windy Bay, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
Michael Flora
Defendant:
Windy Bay, LLC, The Port Graham Corporation and M/V TRANSPORTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Santander Consumer USA Inc. v. Drive.Car LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00288
Plaintiff:
Santander Consumer USA Inc.
Defendant:
Drive.Car LLC and Carrigan Grigsby
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Carter v. The State of Alaska
as 3:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Legacy Foster Carter
Defendant:
The State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Office of Children Services
as 3:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Legacy Carter
Defendant:
Office of Children Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Massey v. Spaan et al
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Massey, Jr.
Defendant:
Micheal Robin Spaan, Philip R. Volland and Micheal L. Wolverton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Havens v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
Krystle Marie Havens
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Adams et al v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough School District
as 3:2023cv00265
Plaintiff:
Dawn Adams, Scott Adams, Jessica Clarkson and others
Defendant:
Matanuska-Susitna Borough School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Burk
as 3:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Johnny-Lee Preston Burk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
