Cases 131 - 140 of 24,630
STEVENS v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv01395
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STEVENS, JOSE RICARDO BURGOS RESTO, HECTOR TOLENTINO and others
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, WELL PATH, DR. IBRAHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TUCKER v. ANTHONY et al
as 5:2024cv01667
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TUCKER
Defendant:
JUDGE JAMES T. ANTHONY, ALFRED STIRBA, EARL C. SUPPLEE, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BADU v. ESSEX COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv01619
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BADU
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY and ESSEX COUNTY DEPT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORGAN v. ORTIZ et al
as 2:2024cv01190
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MORGAN
Defendant:
OFFICER ALEJANDRO ORTIZ, CORPORAL JARED DAVIS and COATESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHESTER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GEE v. COUNTY OF MERCER
as 3:2024cv05319
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO GEE
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MERCER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
CHENG v. BYRD et al
as 1:2024cv05345
Plaintiff:
SHENG-WEN CHENG
Defendant:
K. BYRD, JAMES A. GIBBS, THOMAS J. GUBBIOTTI, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Prime Care Medical, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Prime Care Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CASTRO-MOTA v. GIBBONS, et al.
as 2:2024cv01645
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO-MOTA
Defendant:
DIANE E. GIBBONS, JOHN T. FEGLEY, JILL M. GRAZIANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BADU v. LAW OFFICE OF MONTELL FIGGINS et al
as 2:2024cv02418
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BADU
Defendant:
LAW OFFICE OF MONTELL FIGGINS, DOUGLASS MITCHELL and ASHLEE CHAVES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Gorrio v. Francis, et al
as 24-1711
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GORRIO
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER FRANCIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
