Cases 131 - 140 of 30,883
Johnson v. Watson et al
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Montrial D. Johnson
Defendant:
Elizabeth Watson, Lakin Matthews, R Delgado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Synergy Disaster Recovery, LLC v. Breathitt County Fiscal Court
as 5:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Synergy Disaster Recovery, LLC
Defendant:
Breathitt County Fiscal Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Damrell v. Boom, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Lorene Damrell
Defendant:
Boom, Inc. doing business as Sonic Drive-In
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Divisions, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Divisions, Inc. doing business as Divisions Maintenance Group
Defendant:
Broadspire Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ast v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 7:2024cv00012
Petitioner:
John Raymond Ast
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Edwards et al v. State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Edwards and Cheryl Edwards
Defendant:
State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Baker v. Blane et al
as 6:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Glenn Sam Baker
Defendant:
Eve Blane, Norma Lay, Leamon Partin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bays v. Kenton County Airport Board
as 2:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Nahed Bays
Defendant:
Kenton County Airport Board
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612 Family and Medical Leave Act
In Re Attorney Admission for Sarah Nicole Hall
as 5:2024aa00041
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney Admission Application
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
