Cases 131 - 140 of 13,190
Best et al v. Gerst et al
as 4:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Gordon Best, Kim Lavine-Best, Adam Best and others
Defendant:
Dietmar Gerst, B & D Walters Trucking, LTD and Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Bowen et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 6:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
William Bowen and Pamala Bowen
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Wilcock v. Knudsen
as 9:2024cv00029
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ross v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Destiny Michelle Ross
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Riley v. Sims
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Jay Scot Riley
Defendant:
David P. Sims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Pheasant Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00013
Defendant:
Delores Grenier, Pheasant Inc. doing business as The Bird Bar & Grill, Delores Peterson and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Cook v. USA
as 4:2024cv00023
Petitioner:
Joseph Drayton Cook
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Chesterman v. State of Montana et al
as 1:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lloyd Chesterman
Defendant:
State of Montana, Greg Gianforte, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilcock v. Knudsen
as 6:2024cv00010
Petitioner:
E.B. Wilcock
Respondent:
Austin Knudsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Milligan v. O'Malley
as 9:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Rory Milligan
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
