Cases 141 - 148 of 148
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Holbrook v. Boyd County, Kentucky et al
as 0:2008cv00037
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Holbrook and Michael R. Holbrook
Defendant:
Boyd County, Kentucky, Joe Burchett and John and Jane Does, Nos. 1, 2 and 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Teague et al v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2008cv00081
Plaintiff:
Ja-Ron S. Teague and John Does
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Louisville Metro Government, Jerry Abramson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schell v. Prindle et al
as 2:2008cv00014
Plaintiff:
William L. Schell and William L. Schell
Defendant:
Edward Prindle, Boone County, Kentucky, Ed Prindle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe I et al v. Al Maktoum et al
as 5:2007cv00293
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Minors John Does 1-10,000 and others
Defendant:
Sheikh Hamdan Bin Rashid Al Maktoum and Moes 1-500
Petitioner:
USA
Amicus Curiae:
Washington Legal Foundation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Hebert et al v. Ortman et al
as 5:2007cv00276
Plaintiff:
Jamie Hebert, Jamie Hebert, Jamie Hebert and others
Defendant:
Duff Ortman and John or Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Airline Crash
French v. Daviess County, Kentucky et al
as 4:2007cv00105
Plaintiff:
Billy Joseph French
Defendant:
Daviess County, Kentucky, David Osborne and John and Jane Does, Nos. 1, 2, and 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McQueen et al v. Laurel County, Kentucky et al
as 6:2007cv00258
Plaintiff:
Courtney Perl McQueen, Courtney Perl McQueen, Courtney Perl McQueen and others
Defendant:
Laurel County, Kentucky, Jack Sizemore, Betty McKnight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
