Cases 141 - 150 of 371
BUNTER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2020cv03067
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
ALAIN T. BUNTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
OXNER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2020cv03066
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY M. OXNER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
GARDNER v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv02983
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
DAVID GARDNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WATSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2020cv02505
Plaintiff:
NANCY WATSON and NANCY S. WATSON
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2020cv02482
Defendant:
TYLER STENGLE, TRACFONE WIRELESS, INC., WASHINGTON NAVY YARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOW v. STABENOW et al
as 1:2020cv02486
Defendant:
HEADQUARTERS U.S. AIR FORCE WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, UNIVERSAL STUDIOS, COMCAST, MOODY AIR FORCE BASE and others
Plaintiff:
SHERRY LYNN DOW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv02382
Plaintiff:
ISHMAEL MILLER
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MONIQUE C. DAVIS v. ANDREW M. SAUL
as 1:2020cv02282
Plaintiff:
MONIQUE C. DAVIS
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
FRENCH v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv02248
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE E. FRENCH
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
RUBIO v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv02242
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
IRMA RUBIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
