Cases 141 - 150 of 173
JENKINS v. BECK
as 1:2007cv00478
Petitioner:
ELIJAH JENKINS
Respondent:
THEODIS BECK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MILLER v. WOOD et al
as 1:2007cv00415
Plaintiff:
TACARLOS ANTIGO MILLER
Defendant:
DON G. WOOD, BOYD BENNETT, THEODIS BECK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAWFORD v. BENNETT et al
as 1:2007cv00404
Plaintiff:
MARTIN A. CRAWFORD
Defendant:
BOYD BENNETT, THEODIS BECK, GEORGE CURRIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steele v. Simmons et al
as 5:2007ct03068
Plaintiff:
Trevon Steele
Defendant:
Z. Simmons, Joseph Lightsey, Guard Bosworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOLO v. BECK
as 1:2007cv00364
Petitioner:
LAWRENCE WASONGA TOLO
Respondent:
THEODIS BECK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JENKINS v. BECK
as 1:2007cv00353
Petitioner:
ELIJAH JENKINS
Respondent:
THEODIS BECK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Beck et al
as 5:2007hc02087
Petitioner:
Leon Allen Murphy
Respondent:
Theodis Beck and NC Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MURRAY v. N.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2007cv00352
Petitioner:
ADRIAN DEVON MURRAY
Respondent:
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and THEODIS BECK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GLENN v. BECK
as 1:2007cv00344
Petitioner:
ANDERSON GLENN
Respondent:
THEODIS BECK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BETHEA v. BECK
as 1:2007cv00310
Petitioner:
EDWARD LOUIS BETHEA
Respondent:
THEODIS BECK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
