Cases 141 - 150 of 1,646
Hess v. Township of Saint Thomas et al
as 1:2023cv00544
Plaintiff:
Dale A. Hess
Defendant:
Township of Saint Thomas, Saint Thomas Township Municipal Authority, Travis Amsley and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
LOWERY v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
as 2:2023cv00358
Plaintiff:
CURTIS LOWERY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
ARNOTT v. MINDOULA HEALTH, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv02217
Plaintiff:
MELISSA ARNOTT
Defendant:
MINDOULA HEALTH, INC., ABC CORPORATIONS 1-5 (FICTITIOUS NAMES DESCRIBING PRESENTLY UNIDENTIFED BUSINESS ENTITIES), JOHN DOES 1-5 (FICTITIOUS NAMES OF UNIDENTIFIED INDIVIDUALS) and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Boyer v. UNFI Wholesale Inc.
as 1:2023cv00429
Plaintiff:
Timothy Boyer
Defendant:
UNFI Wholesale Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
WALKER v. CHESTER COUNTY POCOPSON HOME
as 2:2023cv00687
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY WALKER
Defendant:
CHESTER COUNTY POCOPSON HOME and COUNTY OF CHESTER
BRANSON v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
as 2:2023cv01404
Plaintiff:
John Branson
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
WHITE v. HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2023cv00732
Plaintiff:
APRIL WHITE
Defendant:
HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
v. HEMMINGWAY et al
as 1:2023cv02089
Defendant:
SHERRY HEMMINGWAY, SHAWNTAE HAZEWOOD, DANIEL GUERCI and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
LUGO v. HADDAD HEATING & PLUMBING, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv02047
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO LUGO
Defendant:
HADDAD HEATING & PLUMBING, INC., SHALLAN HADDAD, STEVE KHALIL and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
