Cases 141 - 150 of 14,429
Smith v. Brakefield et al
as 2:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Tanja Laverne Smith
Defendant:
Marcus Brakefield, Jeff Moore, Sarah Luz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Dallas v. City of Mobile, Alabama
as 1:2023cv00466
Plaintiff:
Christine Dallas
Defendant:
City of Mobile, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Landry v. Hansen Air Pros, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00463
Plaintiff:
Jamie Landry
Defendant:
Hansen Air Pros, LLC and AFH Air Pros LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Escobar-Valenzuela v. USA
as 1:2024cv00031
Petitioner:
Alonzo Escobar-Valenzuela
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Coyle v. O'Malley
as 2:2023cv00473
Plaintiff:
Joseph A Coyle
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Thames v. New Dairy Alabama, LLC, et al.
as 1:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
Gary Thames
Defendant:
New Dairy Alabama, LLC and Stevie Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Jones v. Andalusia Police et al
as 1:2023cv00459
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Andalusia Police and Covington County Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) (findings & purpose)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
