Cases 141 - 150 of 37,578
Dorman v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Allan Michael Dorman
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Lloyd v. United States Of America
as 7:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
James Ernest Lloyd
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Admiral Insurance Company v. Legacy Biogas, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Admiral Insurance Company
Defendant:
Legacy Biogas, LLC and Environmental Hydrogeological Consultants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Amerock, LLC v. Richelieu America LTD.
as 5:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Amerock, LLC
Defendant:
Richelieu America LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
v. Rangel Gonzales et al
as 5:2024hc02079
Defendant:
Gloria Rangel Gonzales
Respondent:
Sheriff Willie Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rangel Gonzales v. Rowe
as 5:2024hc02080
Petitioner:
Gloria Rangel Gonzales
Respondent:
Sheriff Willie Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker, PLLC v. Corvus Insurance Holdings, Inc. et al
as 7:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Baker, PLLC
Defendant:
Corvus Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Hudson Excess Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
United States of America v. Faulkner et al
as 7:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Michael Faulkner and Cape Fear Transportation LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
