Cases 141 - 150 of 3,708
Triplet v. Henderson et al
as 5:2023cv00587
Plaintiff:
Steven Montrail Triplet
Defendant:
Timothy Henderson, Jimmy Harmon, Stephanie Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Royal v. Christian et al
as 5:2023cv00743
Plaintiff:
Tony Royal
Defendant:
Connie Christian and Octapharma Plasma Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
White v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Edward D White
Defendant:
City of Tulsa and Tulsa Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Calloway et al v. Zoes Oklahoma LLC
as 5:2023cv00582
Plaintiff:
Michael Calloway and Lillie E Calloway
Defendant:
Zoes Oklahoma LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Arce v. Department of Wildlife et al
as 5:2023cv00722
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Paul Acre and Geoffrey Paul Arce
Defendant:
Department of Wildlife, Zachary Paulk, Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hickson v. Durant, City of et al
as 6:2023cv00208
Plaintiff:
Dejuan Hickson
Defendant:
Durant, City of, Thomas Billy, Ricky Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Gosselin v. Jones
as 5:2023cv00723
Plaintiff:
Marcel John Gosselin
Defendant:
Michael A Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duckworth v. Mooney et al
as 5:2023cv00679
Plaintiff:
Portia C Duckworth
Defendant:
FNU Mooney, FNU Stall, JOHN DOE, 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kerby v. Wewoka, City of et al
as 6:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
William Rollins Kerby
Defendant:
Wewoka, City of and Derek Virgil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Emrit v. Jules
as 4:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sabine Aisha Jules
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
