Cases 141 - 150 of 88,724
Burchfield v. Roger D. Wilson Detention Facility et al
as 3:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Robert W Burchfield
Defendant:
Roger D. Wilson Detention Facility, Corporal Reece LNU, Nurse Jones LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Vasser v. DMB Amesbury Springfield, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Travette Tara Vasser
Defendant:
DMB Amesbury Springfield, LLC, CGJ Springfield, LLC and Springfield Asset Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Employment Discrimination
Zimmer v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2024cv00525
Plaintiff:
Brevan Zimmer
Defendant:
Rutherford County and Dr. John Daniel Rudd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGlynn v. Last American Vagabond, LLC, The
as 3:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
David McGlynn
Defendant:
Last American Vagabond, LLC, The
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Scott v. Eller
as 4:2024cv00024
Petitioner:
Malik Scott
Respondent:
Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
