Cases 151 - 160 of 815
Brett v. (unreadable) et al
as 1:2019cv01161
Defendant:
Mike McGloal, Dermont Fishman, Robert Rochwell and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GONZALEZ v. JERSEY STYLE FILMS, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv02868
Defendant:
NATHAN FILE and JERSEY STYLE FILMS, LLC
Plaintiff:
MARIA GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gonzalez-DeJesus v. Mild et al
as 3:2019cv00882
Defendant:
Blanche Mild, Biscoe, Dorina Varner and others
Plaintiff:
Ramos Gonzalez-DeJesus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00679
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
GONZALEZ et al v. UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION
as 2:2019cv01847
Plaintiff:
JUAN GONZALEZ and ANGELA GONZALEZ
Defendant:
UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Marquez et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2019cv00599
Plaintiff:
Eduin Arturo Cambar Matute, Milton Francisco Lovos Marquez, Maria Marquez and others
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Trooper Mackey, Chad Ronk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GONZALEZ et al v. SEASHORE FRUIT & PRODUCE CO. et al
as 2:2019cv01422
Defendant:
SCOTT MATTHEWS and SEASHORE FRUIT & PRODUCE CO.
Plaintiff:
GUADALUPE GONZALEZ and ELIAS GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eisert et al v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2019cv00498
Plaintiff:
Luis Gonzalez and Raymond Eisert
Defendant:
Vincent Mooney and John Wetzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GONZALEZ
as 5:2019cv00951
Defendant:
MICHAEL C. GONZALEZ
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
Gonzalez v. Clayton et al
as 1:2019cv00307
Plaintiff:
Alberto R. Gonzalez
Defendant:
West York Borough, PA, Tyler R. Clayton and Bridgette M. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
