Cases 151 - 160 of 837
Baez-Garcia v. United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv01355
Plaintiff:
David Baez-Garcia
Defendant:
United States of America, R. Kresock, Capt. Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERNELL v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2021cv03344
Plaintiff:
ARYA MILAN PERNELL and AARON MICHAEL PERNELL
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUTT v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 3:2021cv00123
Petitioner:
OMAR BUTT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN V. MOSER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ball v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2021cv01228
Plaintiff:
Reginald Keith Ball
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Officer Munchler, Ms. McNaughty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodriguez-Francisco v. Thompson et al
as 1:2021cv01179
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Rodriguez-Francisco
Respondent:
B. Thompson, Herman Quay, III and The Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
KAETZ v. BUREAU OF PRISONS FEDERAL PRISON BUREAU et al
as 2:2021cv00797
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F. KAETZ
Defendant:
ORLANDO L. HARPER, THE ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL, BUREAU OF PRISONS FEDERAL PRISON BUREAU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Fields v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2021cv01038
Defendant:
S.O.S. Officer Jane Doe, S.O.S. Officer Rollison, A.W. Eckhart and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Fields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Quay et al
as 1:2021cv00988
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden H. Quay
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Harris v. Thompson et al
as 3:2021cv00919
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and R. Thompson
Petitioner:
Kevin Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PERRUCCI v. NORTHEAST REGIONAL DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2021cv02342
Defendant:
NORTHEAST REGIONAL DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff:
ANGELO M. PERRUCCI, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
