Cases 151 - 160 of 263
WILLIAMS v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2015cv00127
Petitioner:
CHARLES WILLIAMS
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BEST v. ECKER et al
as 2:2015cv02361
Petitioner:
RONALD BEST
Respondent:
J.A. ECKER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WRIGHT v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2015cv02161
Petitioner:
ANTHONY WRIGHT
Respondent:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ____________ and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
EVANS v. FULCOMER et al
as 2:1986cv05188
Petitioner:
REID EVANS
Respondent:
THOMAS FULCOMER and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
YOUNG v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2015cv01830
Petitioner:
ROBERT YOUNG
Respondent:
DIGUGLIELMO , SCI-GRATERFORD and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
O'CONNOR v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2015cv01651
Petitioner:
KENNETH O'CONNOR
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX , THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CHARLESTON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2015cv01437
Petitioner:
BRANDON CHARLESTON
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROWN v. TRITT et al
as 2:2015cv01152
Petitioner:
HAAMIR BROWN
Respondent:
BRENDA TRITT, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF KATHLEEN KANE and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
EDNEY v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2015cv00956
Petitioner:
ORLANDO EDNEY
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DAY v. MAHALLY et al
as 2:2015cv00863
Petitioner:
ANTHONY DAY
Respondent:
LARRY MAHALLY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
