Cases 151 - 160 of 9,925
Lynch v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv01142
Plaintiff:
Bryan K Lynch
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00885
Petitioner:
Roy Dean Smith
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mullett v. Lilly et al
as 4:2023cv01270
Petitioner:
Michael Robert Mullett
Respondent:
Veronical Lilly, V. Libby and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv02872
Petitioner:
Larry Lee Davis
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Madden v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00629
Petitioner:
Joseph Benjamin Madden, II
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony v. TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv02868
Petitioner:
James Deduan Anthony
Respondent:
TDCJ-CID and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sosa v. Director, TDCJ
as 5:2023cv01541
Petitioner:
Eddie R. Sosa
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID and Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stastny v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv04720
Petitioner:
Julie Michelle Stastny
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stastny v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00860
Petitioner:
Julie Michelle Stastny
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arguijo v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2023cv00205
Petitioner:
Fabian Arguijo
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
