Cases 151 - 160 of 789
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Avycon
as 6:2022cv00456
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Avycon
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Cop Security System Corp.
as 6:2022cv00457
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Cop Security System Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Brickcom Corporation
as 6:2022cv00452
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Brickcom Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Chandler v. Lane
as 1:2022cv00404
Petitioner:
Timothy L. Chandler
Respondent:
Mike Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Advanced Technology Video, Inc.
as 6:2022cv00414
Counter Defendant:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Counter Plaintiff:
Advanced Technology Video, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. LaVision Inc.
as 6:2022cv00393
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
LaVision Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Stapp v. Denney et al
as 4:2022cv00302
Plaintiff:
Rubbin Wayne Stapp
Defendant:
Rick Denney, Nurse Sartor, Wise County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bunn v. Lane
as 1:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bunn
Respondent:
FNU Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Academy, Ltd. et al v. Estate of Keelan C. Wright et al
as 4:2022cv00999
Defendant:
Estate of Keelan C. Wright, Lori Lane Wright and Keelan C. Wright, II
Interpleader:
Academy, Ltd. and Academy, Ltd. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
