Cases 151 - 160 of 739
McNeal et al v. Watson et al
as 3:2021cv00341
Defendant:
C.O. Sabo, Sgt. Scott, Shan Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn LaFollette, Cameron Belk, Sr., Roderick Whittaker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01018
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Timms v. Holsten Management Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00947
Defendant:
Laruyer Wilson, Jackie Taylor Holsten, Shaun Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Timms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Conan Doyle Estate LTD. v 2000s Hat Store, et al.
as 1:2021cv00929
Plaintiff:
XYZ Corporation and Conan Doyle Estate Ltd.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 2000s Hat Store, ERIC COMPANY Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
McNeal et al v. Watson et al
as 3:2021cv00142
Defendant:
Shan Collins, C.O. Reed, Sgt. Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Miller, Terrell Amerson, Paul Donley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garces v. Gerber Products Co. et al
as 1:2021cv00719
Plaintiff:
Aileen Garces, Stacy Musto, Michelle Lyles and others
Defendant:
The Hain Celestial Group, Inc., Gerber Products Co., Nurture, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv50038
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Guillen v. Reed et al
as 1:2021cv00494
Defendant:
Warden Gomez, Lieutenant Nodine and Lieutenant Reed
Plaintiff:
Brian Guillen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Unknown Mailroom Supervisor et al
as 1:2021cv01029
Plaintiff:
Cleophus Reed, Jr
Defendant:
Unknown Mailroom Subordinates and Unknown Mailroom Supervisor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reed v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00259
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Theresa Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
