Cases 151 - 160 of 32,401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Morinville v. Upstate Correctional Facility RRU et al
as 9:2024cv00531
Plaintiff:
Carlos Morinville
Defendant:
Upstate Correctional Facility RRU, Doe 1, Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yarusso v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
Andrew Yarusso
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gunther v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00530
Plaintiff:
David A. Gunther
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Davis Skurski v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Marie Davis Skurski
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Marshall v. Vaughn et al
as 9:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
James D. Marshall
Defendant:
Officer Vaughn, Parole Officer Kevin Harmer, Cosgrove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chung v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Barrington Yee Chung
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Forrence Orchards, Inc. v. TD Bank et al
as 8:2024cv00525
Plaintiff:
Forrence Orchards, Inc.
Defendant:
TD Bank and Truist Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Hickenbottom v. Anderson et al
as 1:2024cv00526
Plaintiff:
Chandler Hickenbottom
Defendant:
Devin J. Anderson, Marcus Felton, 15 John Doe's and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kirby v. Syracuse Police Department
as 5:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
David L. Kirby, III
Defendant:
Syracuse Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
