Cases 151 - 160 of 53,788
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
American Strategic Insurance Corp v. Hall et al
as 3:2024cv00520
Defendant:
Constance R. Hall, Constance Renee Isbell, Donald Shane Isbell and others
Plaintiff:
American Strategic Insurance Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Hill v. City of Birmingham, The
as 2:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Brinceton Hill
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
McKnight v. CRST Lincoln Sales Inc
as 2:2024cv00516
Plaintiff:
Jeremy McKnight
Defendant:
CRST Lincoln Sales Inc doing business as CRST The Transportation Solution Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DeBrahl-Daniels v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00519
Petitioner:
Leatrice Malika DeBrahl-Daniels
Defendant:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Turman v. Von Maur Inc
as 2:2024cv00521
Defendant:
Von Maur Inc and Von Maur Stores Inc
Plaintiff:
Lisa Jackson Turman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Berry v. Bailey et al
as 5:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Heath Berry
Defendant:
William C Bailey, Robert E (Bud) Cramer, Jim Scanlon and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
