Cases 151 - 160 of 4,389
Hicks v. Virginia Employment Commission
as 4:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Shalanda Hicks
Defendant:
Virginia Employment Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Kowalewitch v. The City of Virginia Beach Government
as 2:2023cv00577
Plaintiff:
Richard Kowalewitch
Defendant:
The City of Virginia Beach Government and Virginia Beach City Manager Patrick Duhaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Swart v. Miyares, et al.
as 3:2023cv00753
Plaintiff:
Hamilton Hall Swart, III
Defendant:
Jason S. Miyares and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Hoffman v. Tatum et al
as 1:2023cv01517
Plaintiff:
Garrett Hoffman
Defendant:
Mark Tatum, Ted Tidmore, Justin Rufo and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Watson v. Newman, et al.
as 3:2023cv00721
Plaintiff:
Donna H. Watson
Defendant:
Richard Keith Newman, Lieutenant Jacquita Rachelle Allen, John F. Keohane, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hooker v. Facciani et al
as 7:2023cv00750
Plaintiff:
Martha Kay Baird Hooker
Defendant:
Cheryl Facciani, Timothy Greenway, Brent Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Armstead v. Anthem/ Elevance Health HR
as 3:2023cv00711
Plaintiff:
Michelle Y. Armstead
Defendant:
Anthem/ Elevance Health HR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rainey v. United States
as 2:2023cv00532
Plaintiff:
Donnie E. Rainey, II
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Glover v. Carlin
as 2:2023cv00661
Plaintiff:
Julius Glover, II
Defendant:
Harley Carlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Sexual Harassment
Spencer v. Direct TV Internet et al
as 2:2023cv00663
Plaintiff:
Georgia Spencer
Defendant:
Direct TV Internet and NRHA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
