Cases 151 - 160 of 80,648
Littlefield v. Splawn et al
as 1:2024cv03057
Plaintiff:
Daniel Edwin Littlefield
Defendant:
B Splawn, Lt T Irion, Lt E Coxen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Littlefield v. State of Washington et al
as 1:2024cv03056
Plaintiff:
Daniel Edwin Littlefield
Defendant:
State of Washington, Yakima County Chief Splawn, Yakima County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ingmire-Lopez v. Whatcom County Jail
as 2:2024cv00305
Petitioner:
Darrell Lee Ingmire-Lopez
Respondent:
Whatcom County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Routh v. Bank of America NA
as 2:2024cv00563
Plaintiff:
Randal Routh
Defendant:
Bank of America, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
JFXD TRX ACQ LLC v. Qing Dao Lan Jing Ling Jiajuyouxiangsi
as 2:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
JFXD TRX ACQ LLC
Defendant:
Qing Dao Lan Jing Ling Jiajuyouxiangsi
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Merch Traffic LLC v. Various John Does et al
as 2:2024cv00560
Plaintiff:
Merch Traffic LLC
Defendant:
Various John Does, Various Jane Does and XYZ Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Krebs v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03058
Plaintiff:
Nathan Krebs
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rodriguez v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03059
Plaintiff:
Francis Joe Rodriguez
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley and SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
