Cases 161 - 170 of 315
COLLINS v. LEMMONS et al
as 1:2015cv01426
Defendant:
DESMA ALLEN, DIANA BUCKMASTER, KEITH BUTTS and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KEITH COLLINS
Corizon:
JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURNETT v. BUTTS
as 1:2015cv01349
Petitioner:
WILLIAM A. BURNETT
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAUSCH v. BUTTS
as 1:2015cv01324
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
CARL DAUSCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01290
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ADAMS v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2015mc00070
Petitioner:
JOHN H. ADAMS
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS, INDIANA STATE PAROLE BOARD and BRUCE LEMMON
UNDERHILL v. YOUNG, et al
as 1:2015cv01257
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS, JABIN COLLINS, ROY DAVIS and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY UNDERHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TURNER v. THE GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2015cv01197
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS, THE GEO GROUP INC. and JUSTIN UPCHURCH
Plaintiff:
KEVIN S. TURNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNDERHILL v. BUTTS et al
as 1:2015cv01119
Defendant:
D. ALTMAN, KEITH BUTTS, CASEBERE and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY UNDERHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RILEY v. BUTTS et al
as 1:2015cv01072
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS, INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL GREG ZOELLER and NEW CASTLE CORRECIION FACILITY
Petitioner:
CLINTON RILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LOCKHART v. BUTTS
as 1:2015cv01063
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
CLEVERLY P LOCKHART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
