Cases 161 - 170 of 279
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00712
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Knight II v. Sanchez et al
as 3:2016cv00149
Defendant:
J. Cossio, Ramm, R. Sanchez and others
Plaintiff:
Karl Knight II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Helfrich v. State of Nevada, Ex. Rel. et al
as 2:2016cv00574
Defendant:
Michael Don Anderson, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, James Greg Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Helfrich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Cox et al
as 2:2016cv00566
Defendant:
Minor Adams, Aranas, Bloomfield and others
Plaintiff:
George L. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sample v. Finley et al
as 2:2016cv00102
Defendant:
Acosta, Carnes, Finley and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Sample
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reitz v. Gillespie et al
as 3:2016cv00011
Defendant:
D. Freeman, Douglas Gillespie, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Duane Reitz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Margaret Rudin v. Nevada Dept. of Corrections, et al.
as 2:2015cv02503
Defendant:
R. Aranas, J. G. Cox, Fergeson and others
Plaintiff:
Margaret Rudin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Cox, et al.,
as 2:2015cv02504
Defendant:
Adams, R. Bannister, James G. Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony K. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sanchez-Jimenez v. USA
as 2:2015cv02376
Petitioner:
Roberto Sanchez-Jimenez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Anderson v. Aranas et al
as 2:2015cv02357
Plaintiff:
Reginald Anderson
Defendant:
Romero Aranas, Jake Murphy and Franscico Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
