Cases 171 - 180 of 413
Hall v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections
as 5:2016cv00090
Plaintiff:
David Hall
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lay v. Orman et al
as 6:2015cv00477
Plaintiff:
Wade Lay
Defendant:
David Orman, Neamyra Riddle, Anita Trammell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2015cv01286
Plaintiff:
David Wilson
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, United States Department of Justice , Veterans Administration Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Steele v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2015cv01238
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline A Steele
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Robert Patton, Kameron Harvanek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Huckaby v. McCollum et al
as 4:2015cv00635
Petitioner:
James Howard Huckaby
Respondent:
Tracy McCollum and Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Slover v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections Internal Affairs et al
as 5:2015cv01171
Plaintiff:
Johnny Allen Slover
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections Internal Affairs and John Marler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cross v. Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2015cv00600
Plaintiff:
Douglas Roy Cross
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Robert Patton, Janet Dowling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bass v. Weir et al
as 6:2015cv00351
Plaintiff:
Kerry Bass
Defendant:
Jim Weir, Ken Golden and Texas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seamster v. Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2015cv00979
Plaintiff:
Stacey Seamster
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Robert Patton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
