Cases 171 - 180 of 6,407
Zapata v. Devris
as 4:2023cv40068
Petitioner:
Carlos Ramon Zapata
Respondent:
Matthew J. Devris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Agneta v. Mici et al
as 4:2023cv40085
Plaintiff:
David Agneta
Defendant:
Carol Mici, Sergio Servello, Lewis Evangelidis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DiCrescenzo v. Salem MA Probate & Family Court et al
as 1:2023cv11268
Plaintiff:
Amanda DiCrescenzo
Defendant:
Salem MA Probate & Family Court and Mary Rudolph Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Reyes v. USA
as 1:2023cv11636
Petitioner:
Marlos Reyes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Allen v. Habit Opt Co Health Services et al
as 1:2023cv11312
Plaintiff:
Dempsey William Allen
Defendant:
Habit Opt Co Health Services, Unknown Lab Tech # 1, Unknown Medical Employee # 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wheeler v. Boncher
as 1:2023cv11139
Petitioner:
David A. Wheeler
Respondent:
Amy Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cabrera Huato v. Warden, FMC Devens
as 1:2023cv11429
Petitioner:
Epifanio Cabrera Huato
Respondent:
Warden, FMC Devens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Saez v. Bounther
as 4:2023cv40061
Petitioner:
Juan Saez
Respondent:
Mr. Bounther and Amy Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Calderon Hernandez v. Warden FMC Devens
as 1:2023cv11330
Petitioner:
Kelvin Ariel Calderon Hernandez
Respondent:
Warden FMC Devens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McCann v. The Collier County Jail
as 1:2023cv11303
Petitioner:
Shawndell Deandre McCann-Joseph
Respondent:
The Collier County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
