Cases 181 - 190 of 207
Garza v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2007cv01453
Petitioner:
Ramiro Garza
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Obujen v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2007cv01309
Petitioner:
Douglas Obujen
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jablonski v. Ayers
as 3:2007cv03302
Petitioner:
Phillip Carl Jablonski
Defendant:
Robert L. Ayers, Jr.
Miscellaneou:
California Appellate Project and Habeas Corpus Resource Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Davis v. On Habeas Corpus
as 5:2007cv03232
Petitioner:
Bryant E. Davis
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramiro Munoz Garza v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2007cv00763
Petitioner:
Ramiro Munoz Garza
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bryant Eugene Davis v. On Habeas Corpus
as 2:2007cv03132
Petitioner:
Bryant Eugene Davis
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wesley W. Hunter v. Habeas Corpus
as 1:2007cv00674
Petitioner:
Wesley W. Hunter
Respondent:
Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garza v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2007cv00535
Petitioner:
Ramiro Garza
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garza v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2007cv00447
Petitioner:
Ramiro Garza
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chatman v. Ayers
as 3:2007cv00640
Petitioner:
Erik Sanford Chatman
Respondent:
Robert L. Ayers, Jr.
Miscellaneou:
California Appellate Project and Habeas Corpus Resource Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
