Cases 181 - 190 of 480
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00949
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
OConner et al v. Agilant Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06937
Plaintiff:
Ramin Pena, Javan OConner, Jonathan Cepada and others
Defendant:
Technical Staffing Professionals, LLC, Agilant Solutions, Inc. D/B/A ASI System Integration, Inc. and Agilant Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pena v. Yellow Bird Auto Center, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03789
Defendant:
Yellow Bird Auto Center, Inc. and Anatoly Abramov
Plaintiff:
Martin Almonte Pena
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Pena et al v. 9019 LLC et al
as 1:2018cv03713
Defendant:
9019 LLC, Hilda Taveras, Melania Jimenez and others
Plaintiff:
Bolivar Pena, Oscar Villalta and Francisco Suriel
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Pena v. Bell
as 1:2018cv04849
Petitioner:
Michael Pena
Respondent:
Earl Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reyes et al v. John Doe Corp. et al
as 1:2018cv03210
Defendant:
Carolina Pena Salcedo, Hormedo Pena, John Doe Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Carolina Sierra and Yohandry Reyes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Walker v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv04815
Plaintiff:
Mortia Walker
Defendant:
City Of New York, Phillip Pena, Pasquale Dethomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pena v. Bell
as 9:2018cv00608
Respondent:
Earl Bell
Petitioner:
Michael Pena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pena v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv02717
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Luz M. Pena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
