Cases 11 - 20 of 24,319
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Blanke v. State of Illinois et al
as 4:2024cv04089
Plaintiff:
Jack Blanke
Defendant:
State of Illinois and Illinois Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv03118
Plaintiff:
Crystal Smith
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Canty v. Lammer
as 4:2024cv04091
Petitioner:
Anthony Canty
Respondent:
B Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Talley v. McGorisk et al
as 1:2024cv01183
Plaintiff:
Durwyn Talley
Defendant:
Timothy McGorisk, Barbara Young, Kirbylee Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rico v. Doe
as 1:2024cv01184
Plaintiff:
Miguel Rico
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Bishop v. CPO Services, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01182
Plaintiff:
Brenda Lee Bishop
Defendant:
CPO Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Coons v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv04087
Plaintiff:
Matthew Coons
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
