Cases 11 - 20 of 100
Hollingsworth v. Karberg et al
as 1:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Stephen Hollingsworth
Defendant:
Kris Karberg, Michelle Waddle, Tracy Dietsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taft v. Blood et al
as 5:2022cv04066
Plaintiff:
David Lynn Taft, Jr
Defendant:
Aaron Blood, Clint Frederickson, Calvin Carver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Shipley et al
as 1:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Armstrong
Defendant:
Amy Shipley, Laura Barner, Dr Dehner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyson v. Macaek et al
as 4:2022cv00369
Plaintiff:
James Charles Tyson, Sr.
Defendant:
Paul Macaek, Amy Divine and Bruce Ingrham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv03037
Petitioner:
Amy Marie Campbell
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wise v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 4:2022cv00242
Plaintiff:
Amy Wise
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Parker v. Greater Regional Health et al
as 4:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
Darla Parker
Defendant:
Greater Regional Health, Monte Neizel, Amy Rieck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ad Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Kroeger v. Progressive Universal Insurance Company
as 4:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Amy Kroeger
Defendant:
Progressive Universal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Cannon v. Karberg et al
as 1:2021cv00118
Plaintiff:
Joe Willie Cannon, Jr
Defendant:
Kristoffer Karberg, Michael Dehner, Amy Shipley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brothern v. Telegraph Herald et al
as 2:2021cv01024
Plaintiff:
Anthony George Brothern
Defendant:
Telegraph Herald, Woodward Communications, Inc, Dustin Kass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
