Cases 11 - 20 of 20
White v. Taylor et al
as 2:2017cv00981
Defendant:
Heather Nevil, Jeri Taylor and Heath G. Wells
Plaintiff:
Daniel David White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rapley et al v. Oregon Department of Human Services, Stabilization and Crisis Unit et al
as 3:2017cv00294
Defendant:
Tessa Baston, Bradley Heath, Jana McLellan and others
Plaintiff:
Britny De Leon, Angela Fenn, Annamaria Magliulo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Saunders v. Klamath Co. Jail et al
as 1:2016cv01088
Defendant:
Jail Staff, Klamath Co. Jail and Klamath County
Plaintiff:
Heath Allen Saunders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Von Borstel v. Johnston et al
as 6:2014cv00646
Defendant:
Heath Johnston and Windriver Trucking, LLC
ThirdParty Defendant:
Lutes Trans Atlantic, LLC
Plaintiff:
Eric Von Borstel
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Windriver Trucking, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Heath et al v. Jones et al
as 2:2013cv01875
Defendant:
Ms. Joan Barton, Greg Jones, Capt. Peterson and others
Plaintiff:
Demetris Gibson, Telly Alexander Heath and Raul Valencia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howington v. Organon USA, Inc. et al
as 6:2010cv06189
Defendant:
Akzo Nobel NV, Merck & Company, Inc., Organon International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Heath Howington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Heath v. Gurski
as 3:2007cv01760
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Lynn Heath
Defendant:
David Gurski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Heath v. Klinkner
as 3:2007cv01380
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Lynn Heath
Defendant:
Nathaniel Edward Klinkner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Heath v. Hill
as 6:2007cv00669
Petitioner:
David Macdonald Heath
Respondent:
Jean Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
