Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. C&G Land Reclamation and Renewable Energy Solutions, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv11253
Defendant:
C&G Land Reclamation and Renewable Energy Solutions, LLC , Clyde Holland and William P. Trainor, Sr
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Holland v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv11212
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Holland
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Banks v. Forbes et al
as 1:2017cv11049
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Kelly Forbes, United States Marshals Service, Mark Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McGrath et al v. City of Somerville
as 1:2017cv10979
Plaintiff:
Michael McGrath , Robert Akenbauer , Michael Ameral and others
Defendant:
City of Somerville
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
In Re Application for Order Enforcing a Subpoena
as 1:2017mc91122
Movant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Peter Holland
Plaintiff:
Darren Steinhof
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv12104
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv11397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv10528
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Holland v. DraftKings, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv13650
Plaintiff:
Daniel Holland
Defendant:
DraftKings, Inc. and FanDuel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holland v. DraftKings, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv13649
Plaintiff:
Daniel Holland
Defendant:
DraftKings, Inc. and FanDuel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
