Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Murphy v. City of Hood River
as 3:2018cv01844
Defendant:
City of Hood River, Pulido, Martin and others
Plaintiff:
James Michael Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harden v. USA
as 3:2017cv00654
Petitioner:
Isaac Symone Harden, Sr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv00309
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Potter v. Dark Horse Comics, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv02090
Defendant:
Dark Horse Comics, Inc., Paulina Ganucheau, Kevin Panetta and others
Plaintiff:
Isaac A. Potter, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Harden v. USA
as 3:2016cv01815
Petitioner:
Isaac Symone Harden, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
McGrew v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2016cv00606
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Isaac H. McGrew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Rarrick v. Isaacs et al
as 1:2016cv00393
Defendant:
Kiley Bergstrom, Dan Bunch, William Bunch and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Rarrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Juliana, et al v United States of America, et al
as 6:2015cv01517
Plaintiff:
Jaime B., Nathaniel B., Victoria B. and others
Defendant:
Ashton Carter, Shaun Donovan, Anthony Foxx and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bynum v. Premo
as 6:2015cv00311
Petitioner:
Isaac C. Bynum
Respondent:
Jeff Premo
503) 947-4794 (fax:
Lynn David Larsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bales v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2013cv02280
Plaintiff:
Isaac D. Bales
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
