Cases 11 - 20 of 30
SCHERER et al v. AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 3:2016cv00232
Defendant:
AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and JOHN N. NEELY
Plaintiff:
THADDEUS A. SCHERER and SHANNON M. TANNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
NEELY v. FACILITY CONCEPTS, INC.
as 1:2016cv03110
Defendant:
FACILITY CONCEPTS, INC.
Plaintiff:
ELVIS NEELY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00457
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NEELY-BEY TARIK-EL v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2016cv01023
Plaintiff:
DERRICK DION NEELY-BEY TARIK-EL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NEELY-BEY TARIK-EL v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2015cv01522
Defendant:
OFFICER D. CONLEY, WENDY KNIGHT, BRUCE LEMMON and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK D. NEELY-BEY TARIK-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEELY-BEY TARIK-EL v. KNIGHT
as 1:2015cv00363
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT
Plaintiff:
DERRICK D. NEELY-BEY TARIK-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NEELY-BEY TARIK-EL v. KNIGHT
as 1:2015cv00216
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
DERRICK DION NEELY-BEY TARIK-EL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neely v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01516
Plaintiff:
Stanley Neely
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet US Reconstruction LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NEELY-BEYTARIK-EL v. KNIGHT
as 1:2014cv00060
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
DERRICK DION NEELY-BEY TARIK-EL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neely v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2013cv01220
Plaintiff:
John Neely
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet Manufacturing Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
