Cases filed in Connecticut
Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Lewis v. Semple et al
as 3:2016cv01202
Plaintiff: David Lewis
Defendant: Scott Semple, Anne Cournoyer, Edward Maldonaldo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jusino v. Frayne et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00961
Plaintiff: Jose A. Jusino
Defendant: Mark Frayne, Gerard Gagne, Jr., Paul Chaplin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Forbes et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00014
Plaintiff: Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant: Scarlett Forbes, Mark Frayne, Gerald Gonye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Forbes et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00613
Plaintiff: Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant: Scarlett Forbes, Mark Frayne, Waldron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herring v. Arnone et al
as 3:2014cv01231
Plaintiff: Aaron Herring
Defendant: Leo C. Arnone, James E. Dzurenda, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forbes v. Bridgeport Hospital
as 3:2014cv01167
Plaintiff: Kadian Forbes
Defendant: Bridgeport Hospital
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
SRSNE Site Group v. Advance Coatings Co., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00443
Plaintiff: SRSNE Site Group
Defendant: Aetna Chemical Corporation, Ambion Corp., American Marking Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01721
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009mc00397
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Forbes v. USA
as 3:2009cv00806
Plaintiff: Walter A. Forbes
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?