Cases 11 - 20 of 89
Miranda v. Pedro
as 2:2023cv00739
Petitioner:
Sintori Lesane Miranda
Respondent:
David Pedro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wallace v. Nooth et al
as 2:2023cv00704
Plaintiff:
Adam Wallace
Defendant:
Mark Nooth, David Pedro, Lemens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia-Rocio v. Pedro
as 2:2023cv00676
Petitioner:
Cresencio Garcia-Rocio
Respondent:
David Pedro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thornton v. Johnson et al
as 2:2023cv00482
Plaintiff:
James Thornton
Defendant:
Mindi Johnson, Amy W. Ray, Portia Villers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmore v. Safeway, Inc., et al
as 3:2023cv00458
Plaintiff:
Ramone Palmore
Defendant:
Safeway, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Safeway, Inc., Kelly Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Shaw v. Stewart et al
as 2:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
Kyler Dakota Shaw
Defendant:
Heidi Stewart, Jeremy Nofziger, B. Culp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morales-Vargas v. Reyes
as 2:2022cv01748
Petitioner:
Pedro Morales-Vargas
Respondent:
Tyler Blewett and Erin Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gardner v. Pedro
as 2:2022cv01749
Petitioner:
Michael Carl Robert Gardner
Respondent:
Pedro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alcalacarrillo et al v. Peters et al
as 3:2022cv00487
Plaintiff:
Oscar Fermin Alcalacarrillo, Adam Steven Anderson, Donald Lee Anderson and others
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Sue Washburn, Paula Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Valdez v. Fhuere
as 6:2022cv00442
Petitioner:
Pedro Cardenas Valdez
Respondent:
Corey Fhuere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
