Cases 11 - 20 of 241
Ramirez v. Pratt
as 3:2023cv02175
Petitioner:
Martin Ponce Ramirez
Respondent:
Glenn E. Pratt and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(SS) Pratt v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv02361
Plaintiff:
Michael James Pratt
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Moses Clark v. Glen E. Pratt
as 2:2023cv04222
Petitioner:
Moses Clark
Respondent:
Glen E. Pratt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sutton et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2023cv02607
Plaintiff:
Anita Edra Sutton, Brent Krichevsky, Brett M. Crowe and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Ryant Trimale Pratt v. A. Smith
as 2:2023cv03173
Petitioner:
Ryant Trimale Pratt
Respondent:
A. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pratt v. Barclays Bank Delaware
as 3:2023cv00712
Plaintiff:
Sara Pratt
Defendant:
Barclays Bank Delaware
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Roxley Oladipo Pratt v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv02130
Plaintiff:
Roxley Oladipo Pratt
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dominguez v. Pratt et al
as 4:2023cv00981
Plaintiff:
Elijah Dominguez
Defendant:
Dan Pratt, Derek Miller, Derek Butts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pratt et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
Christopher Pratt and Oksana Zhurenko Pratt
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pratt v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022at01226
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joseph Pratt
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
