Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Byers v. Hughs et al
as 2:2019cv00429
Defendant:
Amber Terry, Asst. Supt. Jackson, Lt. Houston and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Jerome Byers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gavrilovich Sharipoff v. Myers et al
as 3:2018cv01659
Defendant:
Crisafulli Velasquez or Dominick, (SGT) Ramsey, Sophie Polonsky and others
Plaintiff:
Isaacky Gavrilovich Sharipoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wonnacott v. Oregon Dep. of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv02007
Defendant:
Brigitte Amsberry, Lt. C. Bauer, L. Braun and others
Plaintiff:
David Edgar Wonnacott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramsey v. Taylor
as 2:2016cv00686
Petitioner:
Stephen Glenn Ramsey
Respondent:
Jeri Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Walcutts et al
as 6:2015cv00576
Defendant:
Ms. Michell Baglioni, Mr. Ian Clanton, Mr. Richard Galindo and others
Plaintiff:
Clint Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramsey v. Premo
as 6:2014cv01524
Respondent:
Jeff Premo
Petitioner:
Troy Latrial Ramsey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Clanton et al
as 3:2014cv01290
Defendant:
Ms. Michell Baglioni, Mr. Barnes, Mr. Ian Clanton and others
Plaintiff:
Clint Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Field v. Decoite et al
as 6:2013mc00103
Defendant:
Ramsey Decoite and Thomas N. Decoite
Plaintiff:
Dane S. Field
Debtor:
In Re Maui Ind. Loan & Fin. Co., Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Simmons v. Oregon Dept of Corrections et al
as 2:2011cv01500
Defendant:
Mr. A. Arnold, Ms. M. Branscomb, E. Carbajal and others
Plaintiff:
Ramsey D. Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
