Cases 11 - 18 of 18
SKY LEASE I, INC. v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION f/k/a CARIBBEAN TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2010cv00361
Plaintiff:
SKY LEASE I, INC.
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION f/k/a CARIBBEAN TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Benchmark Export Services et al v. de Jong
as 2:2010cv00007
Plaintiff:
Benchmark Export Services, FTS International Express, Inc., JNSP, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Franciscus Johannes de Jong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00913
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
RUSH INDUSTRIES, INC. v. MWP CONTRACTORS, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv00810
Defendant:
MWP CONTRACTORS, LLC and BRANN'S TRANSPORT SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff:
RUSH INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
L&M Transportation Services, Inc. et al v. Davis et al
as 5:2008cv00253
Plaintiff:
L&M Transportation Services, Inc. and L&M Companies, Inc.
Defendant:
Millard E Davis, Millard E Davis, R Tullis Davis and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Marquez-Garcia et al v. Rogers et al
as 1:2007cv00363
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Marquez-Garcia and Iraima Mendez-Garcia
Defendant:
Thomas Eric Rogers and Gainey Transportation Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
DUFFEY v. CONNER et al
as 4:2007cv00176
Plaintiff:
JOEL ALEXANDER DUFFEY
Defendant:
LLOYD E CONNER, II, Arnold Industries, Inc. and Arnold Transportation Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Con-Way Transportation Services, Inc. n/k/a Con-Way Freight, Inc. v. Diversified Elements LLC
as 4:2007cv00100
Plaintiff:
Con-Way Transportation Services, Inc. n/k/a Con-Way Freight, Inc.
Defendant:
Diversified Elements LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
