Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Ruffino et al v. Archer et al
as 3:2017cv00725
Plaintiff:
John Ruffino and Martha Ruffino
Defendant:
Clark Archer and HCA Health Services of Tennessee, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Archer v. Nabors Truck Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02610
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Archer
Defendant:
Nabors Truck Service, Inc. and James Smith
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Archer v. City of Memphis, et al.
as 2:2015cv02676
Plaintiff:
John W. Archer
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Joseph Payne and Larry Weston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Frazier v. Crump et al
as 1:2015cv00089
Plaintiff:
David Travis Frazier
Defendant:
Steven Crump, Jery Estes, Caroll Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitson v. Archer Western Construction, LLC
as 2:2015cv00020
Plaintiff:
Cecil Dwayne Whitson
Defendant:
Archer Western Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Acuff et al v. G4S Government Solutions, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00337
Plaintiff:
Bryan Acuff , Gabriel Archer , Michael Ashe and others
Defendant:
G4S Government Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bamberger Polymers, Inc. v. Cal Western Packaging Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv02280
Plaintiff:
Bamberger Polymers, Inc.
Defendant:
Cal Western Packaging Corporation , Stratas Foods LLC , Archer Daniels-Midland Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Employment Discrimination
Archer v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America (TV2)
as 3:2012cv00151
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Plaintiff:
Brian L Archer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Murrah v. Archer Daniels Midland Company et al
as 1:2010cv00315
Plaintiff:
Susanne Murrah
Defendant:
Archer Daniels Midland Company and Southern Cellulose Products, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
