Cases 11 - 20 of 3,867
Alsobrook v. City of Marietta et al
as 1:2024cv02249
Plaintiff:
Brandon Alsobrook
Defendant:
City of Marietta, David Beam, Bill Bruton, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
RAINEY v. DAVIS et al
as 5:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
JOZZI RAINEY
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, DEPUTY SHERIFF FREDERICK GRAY and SERGEANT JOHN AHLVIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Lettieri v. Roemer et al
as 1:2024cv02218
Plaintiff:
David Lettieri
Defendant:
Michael J. Roemer, Paul E. Bonanno, Jeffery L. Bagley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kontis et al v. Mississippi Green Oil, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02186
Plaintiff:
David M. Kontis and Scott Shier
Defendant:
Mississippi Green Oil, LLC, Thomas J. Moore III and Charles T. Hill
Oppenheimer v. Highlands Cottages, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00072
Defendant:
Melissa Ann Woolf, Highlands Cottages, LLC, Missy Woolf and others
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
HOLLINGSHED v. DAVIS et al
as 5:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
GARY HOLLINGSHED
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS and AMBER COOK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company v. Tuck
as 2:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
David Tuck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Dyer v. Unnamed Defendant(s)
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Michael David Dyer
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
as 4:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
David B. Gray
Defendant:
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
