Cases 11 - 20 of 527
James v. Hamilton County Jail and Detention Center et al
as 1:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
King Allah James
Respondent:
Hamilton County Jail and Detention Center and Austin Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
King v. O'Donnell et al
as 3:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Michael King
Defendant:
Kevin O'Donnell and Volk Transfer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Mattison v. Rowland et al
as 1:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mattison, Noah Rashad Lyles, Lane Douglas Hills and others
Defendant:
Bucky Rowland, Josh Hyatt and Roger Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Freedom Mortgage et al
as 3:2023cv01138
Plaintiff:
King-Robert L. Brooks
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage and Stan Moskowitz
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0221 Federal Reserve Act
King v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Michael King
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Ettienne v. Peralta et al
as 3:2023cv00937
Plaintiff:
Ronald C. Ettienne
Defendant:
Lt. Jason Peralta, Sgt. Adam Treinn, Supt. William Cope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2023cv00906
Plaintiff:
Brandon King
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Hamilton County Jail
as 1:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
King Allah James
Defendant:
Jim Hammonds, Deputy Cox, Hamblen County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hobbs v. Vance et al
as 3:2023cv00631
Plaintiff:
Aaliyah Hobbs
Defendant:
Carl Vance and Kings Eagle, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Motor Vehicle Product Liability
King v. Frensely
as 3:2023cv00624
Plaintiff:
Brandon J. King
Defendant:
Corporal C. Frensely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
