Cases 11 - 20 of 486
Bey v. Esperance Smith et al
as 3:2023cv01659
Plaintiff:
Ras Eardley Casseus Bey
Defendant:
Thamar Esperance Smith, Jill Shapiro and Alan Zaniewski
Smith Brothers Financial, LLC v. Woodbury Financial Services, Inc.
as 3:2023cv01604
Plaintiff:
Smith Brothers Financial, LLC
Defendant:
Woodbury Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Williams v. Kuhn et al
as 3:2023cv01566
Plaintiff:
Cyrus Williams
Defendant:
Nicholas Kuhn, James Smith, Timothy Speer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Frissora v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 3:2023cv01506
Plaintiff:
Kevin Frissora
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Russell Library
as 3:2023cv01475
Plaintiff:
Ann Smith
Defendant:
Russell Library
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Next Insurance US Company v. Quiles et al
as 3:2023cv01437
Plaintiff:
NEXT INSURANCE US COMPANY
Defendant:
Roberto Quiles, CT Home Building & Remodeling, LLC, Kayla Peirpaoli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Smith v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv01427
Plaintiff:
Renee Smith
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LifeVoxel.AI Inc. et al v. Khan et al
as 3:2023cv01313
Plaintiff:
LifeVoxel.AI Inc., AI Visualize Inc., Kovey Kovalan and others
Defendant:
Amjad Khan, Ethan Brown, BROWN NERI SMITH & KHAN LLP and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
