Cases 11 - 20 of 24
RAMIREZ v. HICKENLOOPER et al
as 1:2016cv01882
Plaintiff:
LUIS ALFONSO SOLARES RAMIREZ
Defendant:
JOHN HICKENLOOPER, RICK RAEMISH, TIANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIVERA et al v. POWER DESIGN, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv00975
Plaintiff:
ALEX RIVERA , MEDARDO ESCOBAR , JENRY ESCOBAR and others
Defendant:
POWER DESIGN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
CARTAGENA v. CENTERPOINT NINE, INC.
as 1:2013cv01071
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO ROBERTO GAFARRETTE CARTAGENA
Defendant:
CENTERPOINT NINE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
LOVE-EL v. FULWOOD et al
as 1:2011cv01678
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO LOVE-EL
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, STEPHEN T. NASKO, STEVEN HUSK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOVE-EL v. JOHNSTON
as 1:2011cv01186
Petitioner:
ALFONSO LOVE-EL
Respondent:
ISAAC JOHNSTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CHAVEZ v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 1:2010cv02145
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO CHAVEZ
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DANIEL et al v. FULWOOD et al
as 1:2010cv00862
Plaintiff:
ROY A DANIEL , ALFONSO TAYLOR , HAROLD VENABLE and others
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., CRANSTON J. MITCHELL and PATRICIA K. CUSHWA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELIAS et al v. ONE STOP SERVICES/HKI, INC.
as 1:2010cv00449
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO ELIAS , ELMER CHICAS , JUAN A. SANCHEZ and others
Defendant:
ONE STOP SERVICES/HKI, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216 Fair Labor Standards Act
ANDERSON et al v. VILSACK
as 1:2009cv01507
Plaintiff:
LARRY F. ANDERSON, BOBBY ABRAHAM, CHARLENE ADAMS and others
Defendant:
TOM VILSACK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
