Cases 11 - 20 of 546
Lewisbey v. Corunjal et al
as 1:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
David Lewis Bey and David Lewisbey
Defendant:
Michael D Corunjal, FNU Stearns, D Freshour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Push Data LLC v. Barnes and Noble, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Push Data LLC
Defendant:
Barnes and Noble, Inc. and Nook Digital, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Clement v. USA Barn, LLC
as 2:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Steve Clement
Defendant:
USA Barn, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Barnes v. TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv02816
Petitioner:
Bernard Kirk Barnes
Respondent:
TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
S3G Technology LLC v. Boot Barn, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00526
Plaintiff:
S3G Technology LLC
Defendant:
Boot Barn, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Barnes v. Road Carriers, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv01012
Defendant:
Conrado Pardillo Carou, Road Carriers, Inc. and Conrado Carou Pardillo
Plaintiff:
Karen Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Barnes v. Mohawk Industries, Inc.
as 4:2023cv04244
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Barnes
Defendant:
Mohawk Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Adaptive Avenue Associates, Inc. v. Barnes & Noble, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00500
Plaintiff:
Adaptive Avenue Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Barnes & Noble, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Lock v. Colonial County Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 4:2023cv01049
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lock
Defendant:
Colonial County Mutual Insurance Company, Joel Andrew Barnes, Sentry Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
