Cases 11 - 20 of 100
Moret v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2021cv00477
Defendant:
Channing Bennett, State of Oregon, James Egan and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Moret
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2020cv01963
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Brayden T. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g
Artisan and Trucker Casualty Company v. Finishline Trucking, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv01762
Plaintiff:
Artisan and Truckers Casualty Company and Artisan and Trucker Casualty Company
Defendant:
Phillip Bennett and Finishline Trucking, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
McCrae v. City of Salem et al
as 6:2020cv01489
Defendant:
Chuck Bennett, Jane or John Does 1-21, City of Salem and others
Plaintiff:
Eleaqia McCrae
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abel et al v. PORCH.COM INC. et al
as 3:2020cv00694
Defendant:
Matthew Erlichman, GOSMITH INC., Darwin Widjaja and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Barker, Mark Anderson, Cyril Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Pearson et al v. Porch.com Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00697
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Foulger, Holly Garner, Nichole Lynott and others
Defendant:
Darwin Widjaja, Matthew Ehrlichman, Brenton Marrelli and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Orozco v. Norton et al
as 2:2020cv00316
Defendant:
Bridgett Amsberry, Troy Bowser, John Myrick and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Kelo Orozco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Cain
as 2:2019cv02005
Respondent:
Brad Cain
Petitioner:
Donald Ray Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Locker v. Norton
as 2:2019cv01720
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Locker
Defendant:
Bennette Norton and The State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Peters et al
as 2:2019cv01474
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Brad Cain, David S. Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
