Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Mohn v. Jewell et al
as 6:2016cv00466
Plaintiff:
Abiodun Ayinde Mohn
Defendant:
Sally Jewell, Mike Conner and Jacob J. Lew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1362
Conner v. Yankee Candle Company Inc The
as 5:2016cv00012
Plaintiff:
Nancy Conner
Defendant:
Yankee Candle Company Inc The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Baldwin v. District Attorney Tulsa County et al
as 4:2015cv00224
Plaintiff:
Tony Baldwin
Defendant:
District Attorney Tulsa County, Stephen Sullin, Gregg Lee Graves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Fitzgerald et al
as 5:2014cv01163
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Rich Fitzgerald, Harper, Landya McCafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter et al v. ACA Insurance Company
as 5:2014cv01115
Plaintiff:
Jerry Carter and Claudia Conner
Defendant:
CSAA Fire & Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Snodgrass et al
as 6:2014cv00201
Plaintiff:
Randy Smith
Defendant:
Deby Snodgrass , Kris Marek , Bryce Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ally Financial Inc v. JSC Enterprises LLC et al
as 5:2013cv00216
Plaintiff:
Ally Financial Inc
Defendant:
JSC Enterprises LLC and Stephen Conner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Davis v. Sturch, et al
as 6:2012cv00406
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Valasta Davis
Defendant:
Bill Sturch , Ken Goldman , John Kitman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prather v. Dick Conner Correctional Center et al
as 5:2012cv00963
Plaintiff:
Shan Darntanquian Prather
Defendant:
Dick Conner Correctional Center, Greg Province and Payne County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson et al v. Halliburton Energy Services Inc
as 5:2011cv01313
Plaintiff:
Jesse Joe Nelson , Lyndsey Lee Nelson and Conner Nelson
Defendant:
Halliburton Energy Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
