Cases 11 - 20 of 39
DIPIETRO v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS
as 2:2019cv15516
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DIPIETRO
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
DIPIETRO v. LEITH
as 1:2019cv13891
Petitioner:
PETER DIPIETRO
Respondent:
MATTHEW LEITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DIPIETRO v. WARDEN OF THE BURLINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2019cv12709
Respondent:
WARDEN OF THE CAMDEN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, WARDEN OF THE SALEM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and WARDEN OF THE BURLINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Petitioner:
PETER DIPIETRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DIPIETRO et al v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2019cv11840
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
BETTY DIPIETRO and JACK DIPIETRO
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIPIETRO v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv14004
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
TRACY ANN DIPIETRO
Defendant:
IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC"), JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv12197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv12196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DIPIETRO
as 1:2017cv12282
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Defendant:
PETER DIPIETRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
