Cases 11 - 20 of 417
SEABROOKS v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
KEREL L. SEABROOKS
Defendant:
VANIHEL, HALL, PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL v. GOODRIDGE
as 3:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
JESSE W. HALL
Defendant:
JOHN GOODRIDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Meier et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
David R. Hall
Defendant:
Debbie Meier, Ashley Tinkle, Kathy Huff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARNUM v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE BARNUM
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, HALL and DEPOSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elzey et al v. Newton et al
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Kortney Lee Elzey, Kortney Elzey, Dustin Havens, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Chris Newton, Jennifer Newton and 24/7 Towing LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Newton et al
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
David R. Hall
Defendant:
Chris Newton and Jennifer Newton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARELL v. PITTAK et al
as 1:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
BETHANY MARELL
Defendant:
OFFICER JOE PITTAK, OFFICER BRYCE BATLING, OFFICER MAKAYLA ELDRIDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIBBS v. PRETORIOUSE et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Defendant:
TRISHA PRETORIOUSE, TRISHIA PRETORIUS, KAYLA HALL and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND LEE GIBBS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibbs v. Pretoriouse et al
as 3:2023cv01093
Defendant:
Trisha Pretoriouse, Trishia Pretorius, Kayla Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lee Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUGHES et al v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE HUGHES
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, CHARLENE BURKETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
